Ferguson v. Kelly et al

Filing 103

ORDER ADOPTING 101 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; granting 81 84 the defendants' motions for summary judgment; dismissing, without prejudice, Ferguson's claims against defendants Kelley, McBride-Andrews, Hubbard, and Iko, based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and dismissing, with prejudice, Ferguson's claims against defendant Corizon. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/6/2015. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION EDWARD FERGUSON ADC # 94606 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:13CV00088 BSM WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere have been received, along with the objections thereto. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety. The defendants’ motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 81 & 84] are granted. Ferguson’s claims against defendants Kelley, McBride–Andrews, Hubbard, and Iko are dismissed without prejudice, based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Ferguson’s claims against defendant Corizon are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of January 2015. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?