Jones v. Ferricher et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing the complaint with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the related Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/16/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL FERRICHER, Sergeant,
Maximum Security Unit, ADC; KENDRICK
NELSON, Lieutenant, Maximum Security
Unit, ADC; WILLIAM STRAUGHN, Warden
Maximum Security Unit, ADC; STEVE OUTLAW,
Assistant Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC;
JOSEPH W. WILLIAMS, Lieutenant, Maximum
Security Unit, ADC; and MAURICE WILLIAMS,
Major, Maximum Security Unit, ADC
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge H. David Young's proposed
findings and recommendations, NQ 20, Jones's objections, NQ 21, and his
motion for appointed counsel, NQ 22. It's unclear what steps Jones has taken
to find a lawyer, and his claims are neither factually nor legally complex.
Ward v. Smith, 721 F.3d 940, 942 (8th Cir. 2013). Motion, NQ 22, denied. On de
novo review, the Court adopts the proposed decision.
FED. R. Crv. P.
Defendants' motion for summary judgment, NQ 15, is granted. Jones's
complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma
pauperis appeal from this Order and the related Judgment would not be taken
in good faith.
D.P. Ma hall Jr.
United States District Judge
16 December 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?