Nelson v. Davenport et al

Filing 102

ORDER ADOPTING 88 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety; therefore, defts' 65 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; defts' motion is granted re pltf's claims against deft Meinzer; pltf's claims against Meinzer are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; defts' motion is denied in all other respects; Curtis Meinzer terminated. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/21/13. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION DUSTIN NELSON ADC #145488 V. PLAINTIFF NO: 5:13CV00092 SWW/HDY MICHAEL DAVENPORT et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (docket entry #65) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. 2. Defendants’ motion is granted with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Curtis Meinzer, Plaintiff’s claims against Meinzer are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Meinzer’s name is removed as a party Defendant. 3. Defendants’ motion is denied in all other respects. DATED this 21st day of October, 2013. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?