Morrow v. Kelley et al
ORDER adopting 85 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Kelley's 61 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and this case is dismissed, with prejudice. The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 12/2/2014. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ADC # 143825
DAVID KELLEY, Lieutenant,
Cummins Unit, ADC, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Ray. No objections have been filed.1 After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Defendant Kelley’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 61) is GRANTED, and this
case is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.
The Court certifies that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 2nd day of December 2014.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
By order entered November 12, 2014 [doc.#87], the Court granted plaintiff an extension
of up to and including November 28, 2014, in which to file his response to the Proposed Findings
and Recommended Disposition. That time has come and gone with no response being filed by
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?