Pierce v. Casion et al
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted; dismissal of this action constitutes a "STRIKE". Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 5/15/13. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ARTHUR EDMONSON PIERCE, III,
MARK CASION, Warden,
Randall Williams Unit, ADC, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections.
After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record
in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this
case is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim on which relief
may be granted.
Dismissal of this action constitutes a “STRIKE,” as defined by 28 U.S.C.
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in
forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be
taken in good faith.
Dated this 15th day of May 2013.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?