Waters v. Felts et al

Filing 8

ORDER directing Mr. Waters to file on or before September 16, 2013, a statement clarifying whether he would like to dismiss all or part of the claims raised in his complaint. 6 . Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/19/13. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BRANDON WATERS, ADC #148641 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:13-cv-145 KGB/JTR JOHN FELTS, Chairman of the Parole Board, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER On June 28, 2013, Brandon Waters filed a motion to dismiss voluntarily this pro se § 1983 action and a request to release him from paying the filing fee in installments (Dkt. No. 6). By prior Order dated May 22, 2013, this Court directed Mr. Waters to pay the filing fee in installments (Dkt. No. 3). Soon thereafter, Mr. Waters sent the Court a letter renewing his constitutional challenges to the prison’s substance abuse treatment program (Dkt. No. 7). Thus, it is unclear whether he still intends to dismiss this case. Mr. Waters must file, on or before September 16, 2013, a statement clarifying whether he would like to dismiss all or part of the claims raised in his complaint. If Mr. Waters chooses to dismiss this case, he must, nevertheless, pay the filing fee in installments. See Williams v. Harmon, 2008 WL 4331125 (8th Cir. Sept. 24, 2008) (holding that a trial court was not authorized to direct prison officials to refrain from collecting the filing fee for a case that was dismissed prior to service); In Re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529-30 (8th Cir. 1997) (explaining that prisoners are responsible for paying the filing fee the moment a civil action is filed). Finally, Mr. Waters is reminded that this case may be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) in the event he fails to comply with this Order. SO ORDERED this 19th day of August, 2013. Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?