Doering v. Corizon Medical Services Inc et al
Filing
58
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 57 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; granting defendants' 48 51 motions for summary judgment; dismissing Plaintiff's 2 complaint with out prejudice with respect to his claims against defendants Corizon Inc., Gaylon Lay and Wendy Kelly and dismissing Plaintiff's 2 complaint with prejudice with respect to his claims against defendant Shaw Richard; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/14/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ALAN DOERING
ADC #106115
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No.: 5:13-cv-00148 KGB/HDY
CORIZON INC. et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 57). No objections have been filed,
and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes
that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
1.
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are granted (Dkt. Nos. 48, 51).
2.
Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice with respect to his claims
against defendants Corizon Inc., Gaylon Lay, and Wendy Kelley.
3.
Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice with respect to his claims against
defendant Shawn Richard.
4.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not
in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS the 14th day of October, 2014.
________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?