Davis v. Adams et al
ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the Court's own proposal. Davis's 2 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order and the related Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/1/2013. (dmn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
EDWARD ADAMS, Captain,
WC "Dub" Brassell Detention Center;
CYNTHIA HUNTER, Lt., WC "Dub"
Brassell Detention Center; BROOKS, Sgt.,
WC "Dub" Brassell Detention Center; and
WC "DUB" BRASSELL DETENTION
No one objects to Magistrate Judge H. David Young's Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition, NQ 5. Seeing no legal error or clear
error of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to
the Advisory Committee Notes), the Court adopts the proposal as its own.
Davis's complaint, NQ 2, is dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal is a
strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma
pauperis appeal of this Order and the related Judgment would not be taken in
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?