Wallace v. Kelley et al.
ORDER ADOPTING 43 Partial Report and Recommendations; therefore, 20 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defts Lay and May is GRANTED; pltf's claims against Lay are dismissed without prejudice and the claims against deft May are dismissed with prejudice; pltf's 34 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/3/13. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BYRON L. WALLACE,
WENDY KELLEY, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Lay and May(Doc. No. 20)
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Lay are DISMISSED without prejudice.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant May are DISMISSED with prejudice.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 34) is DENIED without
IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of October, 2013.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?