Adkins v. York et al
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Partial Report and Recommendations; therefore, defts Iko and Peters are dismissed due to pltf's failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/23/13. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RODNEY A. ADKINS
ADC #97368
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 5:13CV00160 BSM
DEBORAH L. YORK, Health Service
Administrator, Varner Unit, ADC; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe
J. Volpe, addressing Mr. Adkins’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted
with respect to defendants Iko and Peters, has been reviewed, along with the filed objections.
After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is
concluded that the partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and
adopted in all respects.
Accordingly, defendants Iko and Peters are dismissed due to Mr. Adkins’s failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of August 2013.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?