Bowden v. Banks et al
ORDER adopting 53 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendants' 36 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Plaintiff's allegations against Defendants Banks, Bolden, and Page are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Plaintiff's allegations against Defendants Williams and Hudson are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/14/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL D. BOWDEN, ADC #088956
JIMMY BANKS; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the relevant record, see 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(C), the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 36) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendants Banks, Bolden, and Page are DISMISSED
without prejudice, for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.
Plaintiff’s allegations against Defendants Williams and Hudson are DISMISSED with
SO ORDERED this 14th day of November 2014.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?