Sneed v. Sowell et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 . Sneeds complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/25/13. (kpr)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
COURTNEY SNEED
ADC #119285
v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 5:13-cv-184-DPM-HDY

JAMIE SOWELL, Corporal, Tucker Unit, ADC;
STEPHEN WILLIAMS, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC;
CHRIS CODY, Internal Affairs Investigator;
GREGG E. MOORE, Captain, Tucker Unit, ADC;
L. SKINNER, COII, Disciplinary Counsel Substitute,
Randall L. Williams Correctional Facility, ADC; and
RAY HOBBS, Director, ADC

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Sneed objects to Magistrate Judge Ray’s Proposed Findings and
Recommendations. ¹ 5 & 6. On de novo review, the Court adopts Judge
Ray’s decision in full. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (Advisory Committee Notes to
1983 Addition). Sneed’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure
to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
So Ordered.

________________________
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
25 July 2013