Hill v. Watson et al

Filing 8

ORDER denying 7 Motion for Reconsideration. Because the Court dismissed plaintiff's complaint without prejudice, he may re-file the complaint within one year following its dismissal. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 6/18/2014. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DANIEL HILL
ADC #148493
V.

PLAINTIFF

NO: 5:13CV00206 SWW

RANDY WATSON et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Order and Judgment entered
on September 3, 2013, dismissing his complaint without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee,
failure to comply with the Local Rules, and failure to respond to the Court’s Order. Plaintiff states
he did not understand how to complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis and asks to resubmit his complaint alleging denial of medical care.
The motion [ECF No. 7] is denied. Because the Court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint
without prejudice, he may re-file the complaint within one year following its dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of June, 2014.

/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE