Holder v. Cashion et al
ORDER ADOPTING 5 the proposed findings and recommendations; and dismissing 4 plaintiff's amended complaint, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order and judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/28/2013. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:13CV00229-BSM
MARK CASHION, et al.
The proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge
Jerome T. Kearney and the objections filed by the plaintiff have been reviewed. After careful
consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is found that the proposed findings and
recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s amended complaint [Doc. No. 4] against defendants is dismissed,
for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order and
judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?