Champion v. Warren et al
Filing
158
ORDER ADOPTING 156 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Defendant William Warren's 145 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; Plaintiff's 148 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; Mr. Champion's claims are dismissed with prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/16/2016. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JERRY CHAMPION
ADC #91354
PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 5:13-cv-00242-KGB
WILLIAM WARREN
DEFENDANT
ORDER
The
Court
has
reviewed
the
Proposed
Findings
and
Recommendation
(“Recommendation”) filed by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 156).
Plaintiff Jerry Champion has filed an objection to the Recommendation (Dkt. No. 157). After
careful review of the Recommendation, the timely objections, and a de novo review of the
record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and
adopted in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Accordingly, it is so ordered that:
1.
The Recommendation is approved and adopted (Dkt. No. 156).
2.
Defendant William Warren’s motion for summary judgment is granted (Dkt. No.
3.
Mr. Champion’s motion for summary judgment is denied (Dkt. No. 148).
4.
Mr. Champion’s claims are dismissed with prejudice.
5.
It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
145).
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
So ordered this 16th day of May, 2016.
_______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?