Holloway v. Magness et al

Filing 62

ORDER dismissing Does (Corizon and ADC Staff ) without prejudice for lack of timely party identification and service of process 6 . Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/8/14. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
WINSTON HOLLOWAY
v.

PLAINTIFF
NO. 5:13CV00245 JLH/BD

BENNY MAGNESS, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

On August 5, 2013, Winston Holloway filed this action pro se under 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. In his complaint, Holloway asserts claims against unnamed employees of Corizon,
Inc., and the Arkansas Department of Correction.
By Order of September 3, 2013, Holloway was directed to identify the Doe
defendants on or before January 1, 2014, so that they could be served with timely process
in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Document #6. He has not
complied with the Order, and the time for doing so has passed. Therefore, Holloway’s
claims against the Doe defendants are DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of timely
party identification and service of process.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2014.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE