Holloway v. Magness et al

Filing 62

ORDER dismissing Does (Corizon and ADC Staff ) without prejudice for lack of timely party identification and service of process 6 . Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/8/14. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION WINSTON HOLLOWAY v. PLAINTIFF NO. 5:13CV00245 JLH/BD BENNY MAGNESS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER On August 5, 2013, Winston Holloway filed this action pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his complaint, Holloway asserts claims against unnamed employees of Corizon, Inc., and the Arkansas Department of Correction. By Order of September 3, 2013, Holloway was directed to identify the Doe defendants on or before January 1, 2014, so that they could be served with timely process in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Document #6. He has not complied with the Order, and the time for doing so has passed. Therefore, Holloway’s claims against the Doe defendants are DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of timely party identification and service of process. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of January, 2014. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?