Savant v. Huyard et al
ORDER adopting 104 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. The 84 98 motions for summary judgment are GRANTED. Savant's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/5/2014. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
LASOAH SAVANT, ADC #141211
NO. 5:13CV00257 JLH/BD
The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from Magistrate
Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, the timely objections, as well as
a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby
is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. Lasoah Savant has submitted
evidence to contradict his earlier deposition testimony in which he stated that he had not told Thane
Huyard that he was going to file a grievance against him. It is well settled that a party cannot create
a sham issue of fact in an effort to defeat summary judgment by filing an affidavit that directly
contradicts his prior deposition testimony. Herring v. Canada Life Assur. Co., 207 F.3d 1026, 1030
(8th Cir. 2000). Savant has also filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint to add as a
defendant a party that was previously dismissed without prejudice. It appears that permitting the
amendment would be futile, so the motion is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot.
The motions for summary judgment are GRANTED. Documents #84 and #98. Savant’s
claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of June, 2014.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?