Maxwell/G-Doffee v. Clerk et al

Filing 87

ORDER: Maxwell/G-Doffee's appeal, 86 , fails; the challenged Orders 79 and 85 are affirmed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/28/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PLAINTIFF ROBERT THOMAS MAXWELl/ G-DOFFEE, ADC #108778 v. No. 5:13-cv-291-DPM-JJV RICHARD CLERK, Sgt., ADC Maximum Security Unit; RODERICK L. COOKSEY, JR., Corporal, ADC Maximum Security Unit; LEKENYA JACKSON, Corporal, ADC Maximum Security Unit; CHAMBERS, Corporal, ADC Maximum Security Unit; BUTTLER, Correctional Officer, ADC Maximum Security Unit; ENGSTROM, Doctor, Classification Board Member; BILLY STRAUGHN, Warden, Maximum Security Unit; M. WILLIAMS, Major, ADC Maximum Security Unit; GOOLEY, Mail Room Supervisor, ADC Maximum Security Unit; JUSTINE MINOR, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC Central Office; EDDIE TURNER, Sgt., ADC Maximum Security Unit; ANTHONY JACKSON, Captain, ADC Maximum Security Unit; CONNIE L. JENKINS, Classification Board Member; and HILLARD, Correctional Officer, Maximum Security Unit DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court sees no legal error or abuse of discretion in Magistrate Judge Volpe's rulings about the motion schedule or about postponing whether a pre-jury hearing is needed or not. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(a). Maxwell/ G-Doffee' s appeal, N2 86, fails; the challenged Orders, N2 79 & 85, are affirmed. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. (/ United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?