Maxwell/G-Doffee v. Clerk et al
Filing
87
ORDER: Maxwell/G-Doffee's appeal, 86 , fails; the challenged Orders 79 and 85 are affirmed. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/28/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
PLAINTIFF
ROBERT THOMAS MAXWELl/
G-DOFFEE, ADC #108778
v.
No. 5:13-cv-291-DPM-JJV
RICHARD CLERK, Sgt., ADC Maximum
Security Unit; RODERICK L. COOKSEY, JR.,
Corporal, ADC Maximum Security Unit;
LEKENYA JACKSON, Corporal, ADC
Maximum Security Unit; CHAMBERS,
Corporal, ADC Maximum Security Unit;
BUTTLER, Correctional Officer, ADC Maximum
Security Unit; ENGSTROM, Doctor, Classification
Board Member; BILLY STRAUGHN, Warden,
Maximum Security Unit; M. WILLIAMS, Major,
ADC Maximum Security Unit; GOOLEY, Mail Room
Supervisor, ADC Maximum Security Unit; JUSTINE
MINOR, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC Central
Office; EDDIE TURNER, Sgt., ADC Maximum Security
Unit; ANTHONY JACKSON, Captain, ADC Maximum
Security Unit; CONNIE L. JENKINS, Classification
Board Member; and HILLARD, Correctional Officer,
Maximum Security Unit
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court sees no legal error or abuse of discretion in Magistrate Judge
Volpe's rulings about the motion schedule or about postponing whether a
pre-jury hearing is needed or not.
FED.
R. CIV. P. 72(a). Maxwell/ G-Doffee' s
appeal, N2 86, fails; the challenged Orders, N2 79 & 85, are affirmed.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. (/
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?