Love et al v. Retzer Resources Inc et al

Filing 213

ORDER granting the 210 joint motion; dismissing with prejudice what is left of the amended complaint; and unsealing the 211 settlement agreement. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/27/2016. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JONATHAN LOVE, SHERI McWILLIAMS, TRACY KEEN, and ROBIN LOVE v. PLAINTIFFS No. 5:13-cv-292-DPM MICHAEL L RETZER, Individually, and in his Capacity as an Owner, Officer and Manager of Retzer Resources Inc. and the Retzer Group Inc.; and RETZERLLC DEFENDANTS ORDER The joint motion is granted. The Court approves the parties' proposed settlement. In re Flight Transportation Corp. Securities Litigation, 730 F.2d 1128, 1135 (8th Cir. 1984). It makes plaintiffs whole for their alleged back wages - plus liquidated damages in a like amount. The attorney's fees are more than reasonable; they're only a small slice of the fees actually incurred for the whole case. The parties' promise of confidentiality binds them, but not the Court. Delock v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., 4:11-cv-520-DPM, NQ 70 at 3-4 (E.D. Ark. 16 November 2012). The settlement agreement therefore needs to be unsealed. And what is left of the amended complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. * * * Joint motion, Ng 210, granted. Settlement agreement, Ng 211, unsealed. So Ordered. v D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?