Love et al v. Retzer Resources Inc et al

Filing 40

ORDER reconsidering the Court's discovery rulings, 35 . Defendants must produce the ISP-data printouts/time change reports, which they acknowledge having and agree that Plaintiffs are entitled to. Defendants must produce the payroll records in Excel or other electronically searchable format. The Court's order regarding the dialing activity reports stands. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/2/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JONATHAN LOVE, SHERI McWILLIAMS, TRACY KEEN, JEREMY POPE, AND ROBIN LOVE, All Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. PLAINTIFFS No. 5:13-cv-292-DPM RETZER LLC; RETZER RESOURCES INC.; THE RETZER GROUP INC.; and MICHAEL L. RETZER, Individually and in His Capacity as Owner, Officer, and Manager of Retzer Resources Inc., the Retzer Group Inc., and RETZER LLC DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reconsidered its discovery rulings, NQ 35, and makes the following changes. Defendants must produce the ISP-data printouts/time change reports, which they acknowledge having and agree that Plaintiffs are entitled to. When it ordered Defendants to continue accommodating Plaintiffs' format requests, the Court was under the impression that Defendants had already produced time and payroll records in Excel format. See NQ 34 at 4. It appears that the time records, though not the payroll records, were produced in Excel. Defendants must produce the payroll records in Excel or other electronically searchable format. The Court's order regarding the daily activity reports stands. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?