Rushing v. Hobbs
Filing
13
ORDER adopting 9 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Accordingly, judgment shall be entered dismissing this case without prejudice. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner Darnell Rushing has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/25/2014. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DARNELL RUSHING,
ADC # 80025
v.
PETITIONER
Case No. 5:13-cv-00306-KGB
RAY HOBBS, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction
RESPONDENT
ORDER
The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 9). After careful review of the findings and
recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the
Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Accordingly, judgment shall be entered dismissing this case without prejudice. The
Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner Darnell Rushing has not
made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2).
SO ORDERED this the 25th day of July, 2014.
___________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?