Moss v. May et al
Filing
23
JUDGMENT: Moss's claims against May and Hornaday under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed with prejudice; and Moss's claims against May and Hornaday for violating the Arkansas Civil Rights Act, and for the torts of defamation and false light invasion of privacy, are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/14/2015. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
PLAINTIFF
CONNIE MOSS
v.
No. 5:13-cv-312-DPM
JACK MAY, individually and in his official
capacity as Mayor of the City of McGehee;
and LESLIE HORNADAY, individually
and in her official capacity
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
1. Moss's claims against May and Hornaday under the Americans with
Disabilities Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and 42
U.S.C. ยง 1983 are dismissed with prejudice.
2. Moss's claims against May and Hornaday for violating the Arkansas
Civil Rights Act, and for the torts of defamation and false light invasion of
privacy, are dismissed without prejudice.
v
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
/
J{ .~ 101'7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?