Moss v. May et al

Filing 23

JUDGMENT: Moss's claims against May and Hornaday under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed with prejudice; and Moss's claims against May and Hornaday for violating the Arkansas Civil Rights Act, and for the torts of defamation and false light invasion of privacy, are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/14/2015. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION PLAINTIFF CONNIE MOSS v. No. 5:13-cv-312-DPM JACK MAY, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of McGehee; and LESLIE HORNADAY, individually and in her official capacity DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT 1. Moss's claims against May and Hornaday under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Moss's claims against May and Hornaday for violating the Arkansas Civil Rights Act, and for the torts of defamation and false light invasion of privacy, are dismissed without prejudice. v D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge / J{ .~ 101'7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?