Moore v. Hobbs

Filing 14

ORDER adopting 12 proposed findings and recommended disposition in their entirety in all respects. Accordingly, Hobbs's 8 motion to dismiss is granted. Plaintiff's petition is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied. See Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/19/2014. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MARTINOUS MOORE v. PETITIONER CASE NO. 5:13CV00331 BSM RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The proposed findings and recommended disposition received from Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed, along with the filed objections. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. Accordingly, Ray Hobbs’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 8] is granted. Martinous Moore’s petition is dismissed without prejudice so that he may seek permission from the Court of Appeals to file his petition. It will not be transferred to the Court of Appeals. It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied. See Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases In The United States District Courts. IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of February 2014. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?