Humble v. Arkansas County Detention Center et al
ORDER ADOPTING 10 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendants James A. Tucker and Jim Tucker are the same person, so the Clerk shall terminate Jim Tucker; Defendants Arkansas Co unty Jail and Sabrina Greer are dismissed without prejudice; Mr. Humble's claims against defendants Robbie Fread and James A. Tucker are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim; dismissal of this action counts as a strike and the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 06/09/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JAMES HUMBLE, JR.
ADC # 117144
Case No. 5:13-cv-00345-KGB-JJV
DETENTION CENTER, et al.
The Court has reviewed the proposed findings and recommendations submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 10). No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommendations should be,
and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
Defendants James A. Tucker and Jim Tucker are the same person, so the Clerk
shall terminate Jim Tucker.
Defendants Arkansas County Jail and Sabrina Greer are dismissed without
prejudice pursuant to James Humble, Jr.’s, amended complaint.
Mr. Humble’s claims against defendants Robbie Fread and James A. Tucker are
dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2014.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?