Davis v. Hobbs et al
ORDER denying 44 Motion to Amend. Unopposed recommendation 43 adopted. 36 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/31/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RICHARD ALAN DAVIS
ADC # 89568
CURTIS MEINZER, Deputy
Warden, Varner, ADC
1. Davis sued some prison officials for allegedly retaliating against him
for filing a § 1983 claim. NQ 4. He moves, opposed, to supplement his
complaint to add some new defendants and a claim that some officials
retaliated against him for filing grievances. The motion to amend, NQ 44, is
denied. Dispositive motions are due in a month; the new claims are unrelated
to the original claims, so more discovery would be needed and the Scheduling
Order would be derailed. There's also, as Meinzer points out, an exhaustion
tangle as to the new claims.
2. Unopposedrecommendation,Ng43,adopted. FED.R.CIV.P. 72(b)(3).
Motion for preliminary injunction, NQ 36, denied.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?