Jackson v. Tucker et al

Filing 85

JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the jury verdicts, judgment is entered in favor of Jim Tucker and Candace (Vetsch) Briggs on the claims of Kim Derick Jackson. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to the claims against these defendants. A mistrial order as to the claims against Allen Spencer will be entered separately.Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 04/08/2016. (alm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION KIM DERICK JACKSON ADC #100235 v. PLAINTIFF NO. 5:13CV00355 JLH JIM TUCKER, Chief Officer, DeWitt Police Department, et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT On the 5th day of April, 2016, this action came before the Court for trial by jury. Kim Derick Jackson appeared in person and through his lawyer, William G. Almand. Jim Tucker, Allen Spencer, and Candace Briggs (originally named as Vetsch) appeared in person and through their lawyers, Amanda LaFever and John Lennon Wilkerson. All parties announced ready for trial. After all of the evidence had been received and the jury had been duly instructed on the law, on April 7, 2016, the jury returned verdicts in favor of Jim Tucker and Candace (Vetsch) Briggs. The jury announced that it was unable to reach a verdict on the claims of Kim Derick Jackson against Allen Spencer, so the Court declared a mistrial as to those claims. Pursuant to the jury verdicts, judgment is entered in favor of Jim Tucker and Candace (Vetsch) Briggs on the claims of Kim Derick Jackson. The complaint of Kim Derick Jackson is dismissed with prejudice as to the claims against Jim Tucker and Candace (Vetsch) Briggs. A mistrial order as to the claims of Kim Derick Jackson against Allen Spencer will be entered separately. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2016. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?