Jackson v. Tucker et al
Filing
85
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the jury verdicts, judgment is entered in favor of Jim Tucker and Candace (Vetsch) Briggs on the claims of Kim Derick Jackson. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to the claims against these defendants. A mistrial order as to the claims against Allen Spencer will be entered separately.Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 04/08/2016. (alm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
KIM DERICK JACKSON
ADC #100235
v.
PLAINTIFF
NO. 5:13CV00355 JLH
JIM TUCKER, Chief Officer,
DeWitt Police Department, et al.
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
On the 5th day of April, 2016, this action came before the Court for trial by jury. Kim
Derick Jackson appeared in person and through his lawyer, William G. Almand. Jim Tucker, Allen
Spencer, and Candace Briggs (originally named as Vetsch) appeared in person and through their
lawyers, Amanda LaFever and John Lennon Wilkerson. All parties announced ready for trial. After
all of the evidence had been received and the jury had been duly instructed on the law, on April 7,
2016, the jury returned verdicts in favor of Jim Tucker and Candace (Vetsch) Briggs. The jury
announced that it was unable to reach a verdict on the claims of Kim Derick Jackson against Allen
Spencer, so the Court declared a mistrial as to those claims.
Pursuant to the jury verdicts, judgment is entered in favor of Jim Tucker and Candace
(Vetsch) Briggs on the claims of Kim Derick Jackson. The complaint of Kim Derick Jackson is
dismissed with prejudice as to the claims against Jim Tucker and Candace (Vetsch) Briggs. A
mistrial order as to the claims of Kim Derick Jackson against Allen Spencer will be entered
separately.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2016.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?