Bridges v. Corizon Inc et al
ORDER ADOPTING 106 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; granting 82 85 Defendants' motions for summary judgment; denying 101 Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, 104 and his motion for a temporary restraining order; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/5/2015. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
WILLIAM EARL BRIDGES
CASE NO: 5:13CV00366 BSM
CORIZON INC., et al.
The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been received, along with the objections thereto.
After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, it is
concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby
are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Defendants’ motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 82 & 85] are granted,
and plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice.
Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, and his motion for a temporary
restraining order [Doc. Nos. 101 & 104] are denied.
It is further certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 5th day of May 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?