Williams v. Corizon et al

Filing 99

ORDER adopting 97 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Defendants' 84 87 motions for summary judgment are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's 2 complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's 82 motion for a preliminary injunction, and his 93 94 counter motions for summary judgment, are DENIED. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/25/2015. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DAVID WILLIAMS
ADC #78730
v.

PLAINTIFF

NO. 5:13CV00389 JLH

CORIZON LLC et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court
concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (docket entries #84 & #87) are

GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (docket entry #82), and his counter

motions for summary judgment (docket entries #93 & #94), are DENIED.
3.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 25th day of February, 2015.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE