Green v. Hobbs

Filing 49

ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING 16 PARTIAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects and denying 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and TRO. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/08/2014. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAMES EDWARD GREEN, JR., ADC #113001 v. PETITIONER Case No. 5:14-cv-00009-KGB/HDY RAY HOBBS, Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received the Findings and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge H. David Young (Dkt. No. 16). In response, petitioner James Edward Green, Jr., filed an objection (Dkt. No. 18) and a statement of necessity (Dkt. No. 19). On February 21, 2014, Mr. Green also filed a “motion for ‘reconsideration’ of denial for a ‘preliminary injunction’ and ‘restraining’ order” (Dkt. No. 26). The Court construes this as a second objection to the Findings and Recommendation. After a careful review of the Findings and Recommendation, the timely objection and statement of necessity received thereto, and a de novo review of the record, including Mr. Green’s untimely objection, the Court concludes that the Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. The Court determines no evidentiary hearing is necessary. The Court denies the motion for preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order filed by Mr. Green (Dkt. No. 7). SO ORDERED this the 8th day of May, 2014. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?