Washington v. Cherry et al

Filing 18

ORDER directing Defendants to provide to the Court complete copies of the grievances at issue in this case within ten days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 04/25/2014. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MARCUS L. WASHINGTON v. PLAINTIFF 5:14CV00014-JLH-JTK KARL CHERRY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff filed a Response in opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 15), and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. No. 16.) At issue is whether Plaintiff properly exhausted his administrative remedies prior to filing this lawsuit, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Defendants argue that the grievances Plaintiff filed were not properly exhausted, and Plaintiff claims he filed the grievances as soon as he became aware of the alleged violations by Defendants. However, these grievances have not been made a part of the record by either party. The Court finds that in order to properly review this issue, it must have complete copies of the two grievances filed by Plaintiff, including all the ADC responses. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants provide to the Court complete copies of the grievances at issue in this case, which includes all ADC responses at all levels, within ten days of the date of this Order. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of April, 2014. ______________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?