Smith v. Hobbs
Filing
16
ORDER adopting 12 Report and Recommendations. The circuit court's decision rejecting Smith's ineffectiveness claims was not objectively unreasonable. No 6-3; Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782,792-93 (2001). Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/13/2014. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JOSEPH L. SMITH
ADC # 154867
v.
PETITIONER
No. 5:14-cv-20-DPM-HDY
RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas
Department of Correction
RESPONDENT
ORDER
Opposedrecommendation,NQ 12,adopted. FED.R.CIV.P. 72(b)(3). The
circuit court's decision rejecting Smith's ineffectiveness claims was not
objectively unreasonable. NQ 6-3; Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782,792-93 (2001).
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.~
United States District Judge
I3
rJv,..;.e :l.o llf
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?