King v. Davis Life Care Center
Filing
31
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 30 Opinion and Order entered in this matter on this date, the Court grants defendant Davis Life Care Center's 14 motion for summary judgment. To the extent that this Court's Order does not dispose of Ms. King's claims under Arkansas state law, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over such claims and dismissed them without prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/13/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
LOUISE KING
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:14-cv-00021-KGB
DAVIS LIFE CARE CENTER
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Order entered in this matter on this date, the Court grants defendant Davis
Life Care Center’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 14). The Court enters judgment in
favor of defendant Davis Life Care Center on plaintiff Louise King’s claims under the Family
and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. § 1981; Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; and the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206 et seq., and on any
retaliation claims alleged. The Court dismisses without prejudice consistent with the Order
entered in this matter on this date Ms. King’s claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act
(“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.
§ 623 et seq. To the extent that this Court’s Order does not dispose of Ms. King’s claims under
Arkansas state law, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over such claims and
dismisses them without prejudice.
SO ADJUDGED this 13th day of November 2015.
_______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?