Eldridge et al v. Arkansas County et al
Filing
64
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 63 Opinion and Order entered in this matter on June 23, 2015, the Court dismisses with prejudice plaintiffs' claim under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs' remaining state law claims and dismisses without prejudice those claims. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 07/22/2015. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
HONORABLE B. PARK ELDRIDGE, JR.,
individually and in his official capacity;
and ASHLEY BROOKE
BOYETT, individually and in her official capacity
v.
PLAINTIFFS
Case No. 5:14-cv-00023-KGB
ARKANSAS COUNTY AND THE CITY
OF DEWITT, ARKANSAS
DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
Consistent with the Opinion and Order entered in this matter on June 23, 2015, the Court
dismisses with prejudice plaintiffs’ claim under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ remaining
state law claims and dismisses without prejudice those claims. Plaintiffs’ remaining state law
claims “shall be tolled while the claim[s] [have been pending] and for a period of 30 days after
[they are] dismissed unless State law provides for a longer period.” 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d).
SO ORDERED this 22nd day of July, 2015.
_______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?