Ashford v. Catoe et al

Filing 29

ORDER denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel as moot. Defendants' Response 28 indicates that Defendants have served Plaintiff with responses to his 4/17/2014 Interrogatories. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 06/11/2014. (kcs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CHARLES ASHFORD, ADC #133975 V. PLAINTIFF 5:14CV00031 JLH/JTR CATOE, Sergeant; and TAYLOR, Correctional Officer, Tucker Maximum Security Unit, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (doc. 23) is DENIED, AS MOOT. Defendants’ Response (doc. 28) indicates that Defendants have served Plaintiff with responses to his April 17, 2014 Interrogatories. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2014. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?