Ashford v. Catoe et al
Filing
30
ORDER adopting 27 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying 13 19 Motions for Preliminary Injunction. Medical personnel at Tucker Max shall immediately give pla intiff a complete physical examination, photograph any injuries or evidence of scars etc., related to any injuries consistent with those described in plaintiff's amended complaint, and prepare a report noting in detail the results of their physical examination. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/27/2014. (ks)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CHARLES ASHFORD,
ADC #133975
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 5:14CV00031 JLH/JTR
CATOE, Sergeant; and
TAYLOR, Correctional Officer,
Tucker Maximum Security Unit, ADC
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After
careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial
Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings
in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction are DENIED. Documents #13 and #19.
2.
Medical personnel at Tucker Max shall immediately give plaintiff a complete
physical examination, photograph any injuries or evidence of scars etc., related to any injuries
consistent with those described in plaintiff’s amended complaint, and prepare a report noting in
detail the results of their physical examination.
3.
The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 27th day of June, 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?