Ashford v. Catoe et al

Filing 35

ORDER adopting 34 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying 31 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 191 (a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/29/2014. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CHARLES ASHFORD,
ADC #133975
v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 5:14CV00031 JLH/JTR

JAMES CATOE, Sergeant; and
KEITH TAYLOR, Correctional Officer,
Tucker Maximum Security Unit, ADC

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After
careful review, the Court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all
respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Ashford’s motion for a preliminary injunction is denied. Document #31.

2.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 29th day of August, 2014.

J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE