Huffstatler v. Kelly et al

Filing 12

ORDER adopting as clarified 10 Partial Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Huffstatler's claims against Kelly, Huff, Shock, Pepper, Carswell, Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon, Hobbs, and Williams are dismissed. Huffstatler's 1983 claim against King based on alleged verbal abuse is dismissed. An Eighth Amendment claim against King based on the other allegations about him remains. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/21/2014. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION

MATTHEW DAVID HUFFSTATLER
ADC # 155080

PLAINTIFF

No. 5:14-cv-49-DPM-JTK

v.

WENDY KELLY, Assistant Director, ADC;
KING, Administration, Tucker Unit, ADC;
HUFF, RN, Corizon; SHOCK, Doctor, Corizon;
PEPPER, Doctor, Corizon; CARSWELL, LPN,
CORIZON; ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTION; CORIZON; RAY HOBBS; and
STEVE WILLIAMS

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Unopposed recommendation, NQ 10, adopted as clarified. FED. R. CIV.
P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to Advisory Committee Notes). Huffstatler' s claims
against Kelly, Huff, Shock, Pepper, Carswell, Arkansas Department of
Correction, Corizon, Hobbs, and Williams are dismissed. Huffstatler' s § 1983
claim against King based on alleged verbal abuse is dismissed. An Eighth
Amendment claim against King based on the other allegations about him
remains.
So Ordered.

#-·

;..!!?YJ..,.d...P

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
21 March 2014