Barnes v. Cashion et al

Filing 7

ORDER adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. 1 Motion to proceed IFP is denied. Should Plaintiff wish to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of � 36;400.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number, within 10 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. Plainitff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 3/21/2014. (ks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION GUY CLAYTON BARNES, ADC #93209 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:14CV00058-JLH-JJV MARK CASHION, Warden, Randall Williams Unit, ADC; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit is DENIED. Document #1. 2. Should Plaintiff wish to continue this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee of $400.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number, within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. 3. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED this 21st day of March, 2014. ___________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?