Smith v. Hobbs

Filing 14

ORDER adopting as modified 11 Report and Recommendations.; denying 13 Motion to Compel as moot. The Court overrules Smith's 12 objections and adopts the statute-of-limitation analysis of the 11 Recommendation. No certificate of appealability will issue as Smith has made no substantial showing that his constitutional rights were violated. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/18/2014. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION TYRONE RODDELL SMITH ADC #13372 No. 5:14-cv-70-DPM-JTK v. PETITIONER RESPONDENT RAY HOBBS ORDER On de novo review, the Court overrules Smith's objections, NQ 12, adopts the statute-of-limitation analysis of the opposed recommendation, NQ 11, and declines the rest of the recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). The record presents no adequate basis for equitable tolling. Smith's motion to compel, NQ 13, is denied as moot. No certificate of appealability will issue because Smith has made no substantial showing that his constitutional rights were violated. 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c). So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. t/ United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?