Deshazer v. Arkansas, State of et al
Filing
15
ORDER approving and adopting 13 proposed findings and recommended partial disposition; dismissing Defendants the State of Arkansas and the Arkansas Department of Correction without prejudice and denying Plaintiff's request for early release. An in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 07/02/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
KENDRA KATRISE DESHAZER
ADC# 707085
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 5:14CV00072 BSM
ARKANSAS, STATE OF, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe have been reviewed, along with the objections filed.
After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record in this case, it is concluded
that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants the State of Arkansas, the Arkansas Department of Correction, and
Ray Hobbs are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the second amended complaint.
[Doc. No. 11].
2.
Plaintiff’s request for early release to seek medical attention is DENIED
without prejudice so she may pursue it through filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus.
3.
Plaintiff may proceed on her claim for deliberate indifference and request for
monetary damages and injunctive relief against defendants named in the second amended
complaint.
4.
It is further certified that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma
pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 2nd day of July 2014.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?