Lindsey v. Griffin et al

Filing 79

ORDER granting 76 Motion for Reconsideration, modifying 64 MOTION to Compel, directing the Clerk to forward to Plaintiff a copy of [58-1] and denying in all other respects 64 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 09/02/2014. (rhm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JOSEPH LINDSEY,
ADC #132800
v.

PLAINTIFF

5:14CV00073-DPM-JTK

RORY GRIFFIN, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s August 26, 2014 Order (Doc. No.
76) is GRANTED.1 The August 26, 2014 Order is hereby modified as follows:
“Plaintiff’s Subsequent Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART, and
Defendants shall ensure that Plaintiff is provided the opportunity within fifteen days of this Order
to review his physical institutional and medical jackets. In addition, the Clerk shall forward to
Plaintiff a copy of Doc. No. 58-1.
Plaintiff’s Subsequent Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 64) is DENIED in all other respects.”
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2014.

______________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

Defendants’ counsel erroneously indicated to the Court in their prior Response (Doc.
No. 58) that Plaintiff could review EOMIS and electronic case files. Counsel states in the
present Motion that ADC policy does not permit inmates to review the electronic EOMIS files.
1

2