Lindsey v. Griffin et al
ORDER granting 76 Motion for Reconsideration, modifying 64 MOTION to Compel, directing the Clerk to forward to Plaintiff a copy of [58-1] and denying in all other respects 64 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 09/02/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RORY GRIFFIN, et al.
Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s August 26, 2014 Order (Doc. No.
76) is GRANTED.1 The August 26, 2014 Order is hereby modified as follows:
“Plaintiff’s Subsequent Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 64) is GRANTED IN PART, and
Defendants shall ensure that Plaintiff is provided the opportunity within fifteen days of this Order
to review his physical institutional and medical jackets. In addition, the Clerk shall forward to
Plaintiff a copy of Doc. No. 58-1.
Plaintiff’s Subsequent Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 64) is DENIED in all other respects.”
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2014.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Defendants’ counsel erroneously indicated to the Court in their prior Response (Doc.
No. 58) that Plaintiff could review EOMIS and electronic case files. Counsel states in the
present Motion that ADC policy does not permit inmates to review the electronic EOMIS files.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?