Jones et al v. Iko et al
JUDGMENT: Jones's constitutional claims against York are dismissed with prejudice. His malpractice claim against York is dismissed without prejudice. Jones's claims against Skillen and Watson are dismissed with prejudice. Jones's claims against Clark, Goldman, and Harris are dismissed without prejudice. Jones's claims against Iko are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/11/2016. (jak)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?