Vann v. Olson et al

Filing 104

JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 103 Order entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 07/30/2015. (rhm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION CLAYTON LAMONT VANN ADC #108062 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:14-cv-00118-KGB-JTR CONNIE HUBBARD, APN Varner Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Consistent with the Order entered on this day, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is dismissed. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants on plaintiff Clayton Lamont Vann’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and this case is closed. This Court dismisses with prejudice Mr. Vann’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and dismisses without prejudice his pendent state medical malpractice claims. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. SO ADJUDGED this the 30th day of July, 2015. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?