Vann v. Olson et al
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 33 39 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED PARTIAL DISPOSITIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; denying Plaintiff Clayton Lamont Vann's 11 motion for preliminary injunction; dism issing Defendant Wendy Kelly without prejudice due to failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/14/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CLAYTON LAMONT VANN
Case No. 5:14-cv-00118-KGB-JTR
MICHELINE OLSON, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Dispositions
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. Nos. 33, 39). No objections
have been filed, and the time for filing objections has passed. After careful consideration, the
Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Dispositions should be,
and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
It is therefore ordered that:
Plaintiff Clayton Lamont Vann’s motion for preliminary injunction is denied
(Dkt. No. 11).
Defendant Wendy Kelly is dismissed without prejudice from this action due to
Mr. Vann’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted against her.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order adopting these Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Dispositions
would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this the 14th day of October, 2014.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?