Thacker v. Kelley et al

Filing 60

ORDER ADOPTING 58 the recommended disposition; dismissing 51 Defendants' motion for summary judgment, and dismissing Thacker's complaint; dismissing 1 Thacker's complaint, without prejudice, with respect to his claims against We ndy Kelley and Sharon King, and dismissing with prejudice with respect to his claims against all other defendants; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/10/2016. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
HARLIE THACKER
ADC #152566
V.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO: 5:14CV00129 BSM

WENDY KELLEY, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia
S. Harris and plaintiff’s objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration
of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is
hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 51] is granted, and Thacker’s
complaint is dismissed.
2. Thacker’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice with respect to his claims
against Wendy Kelley and Sharon King, and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice with
respect to his claims against all other defendants.
3. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal
from this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of May 2016.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE