Morrow v. Lay et al
ORDER ADOPTING 41 the proposed findings and recommended disposition; dismissing Berry Morrow's complaint, with prejudice, with respect to the claim that his housing conditions amounted to cruel and unusual punishment; and dismissing the compl aint, without prejudice, with respect to Morrow's claims that his packages were stolen and he was discriminated against based on his religious beliefs for failure to exhaust administrative remedy. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/1/2015. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:14CV00152 BSM
GAYLON LAY, DONALD TATE, SR.,
JIMMY KIRTLEY, and LARRY MAY
The proposed findings and recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been
filed. After careful consideration, the RD are hereby approved and adopted in their entirety
in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Berry Morrow’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice with
respect to the claim that his housing conditions amounted to cruel and unusual punishment;
The complaint is dismissed without prejudice with respect to Morrow’s claims
that his packages were stolen and he was discriminated against based on his religious beliefs
for failure to exhaust administrative remedy.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of April 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?