Barnes v. Hobbs et al
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING 7 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND PARTIAL RECOMMENDATIONS in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice defendants Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelley, Mark Cashion, Courtney, Richardson, and Sperry; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/14/2014. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
GUY CLAYTON BARNES
Case No. 5:14-cv-00159-KGB-JJV
RAY HOBBS, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. No. 7). No timely objections were filed.
Plaintiff Guy Clayton Barnes filed untimely objections to the Proposed Findings and
Recommendations (Dkt. No. 16). After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in
their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Even if this Court were to consider the
untimely objections filed by Mr. Barnes, based on those objections and a de novo review of the
record in this case, the Court would adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their
entirety. It is therefore ordered that defendants Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelley, Mark Cashion,
Courtney, Richardson, and Sperry be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies, pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken
in good faith.
SO ORDERED this the 14th day of October, 2014.
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?