Slocum v. Payne

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING 18 Proposed Partial Findings and Recommendations. The Court refers this case to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with the Partial Disposition. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/15/2015. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JACQUES R. SLOCUM ADC #147955 v. PETITIONER Case No. 5:14-cv-00163-JM-JTK WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After careful review of the findings and recommendations and the timely objections thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in their entirety. The Court refers this case to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with the Partial Disposition. SO ORDERED this 15th day of April, 2015. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JACQUES R. SLOCUM ADC #152766 v. PETITIONER Case No. 5:14-cv-00163-JM-JTK WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After careful review, the Court concludes that the findings and recommendations should be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects in their entirety. The Court refers this case to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with the Partial Disposition. SO ORDERED this day of , 2015. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?