Barker v. Barnes et al

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING 35 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff's 32 Motion to Renew is DENIED; Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Proceed contains the same arguments as those addressed in the Recommended Disposition and is DENIED for the same reasons. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and his claims against the remaining Defendants Barnes, White and Savoy are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/23/2015. (mcz)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
LARRY E. BARKER
ADC # 129415
V.

PLAINTIFF
5:14CV00181JM/JTR

BARNES, Randall Williams Unit, ADC, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended
Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No
objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Renew (Docket No. 32) is DENIED.

2.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed (Docket No. 34) contains the same

arguments as those addressed in the Recommended Disposition and is DENIED for
the same reasons.
3.

Plaintiff's Complaint (Docket No. 1) and his claims against the

remaining Defendants Barnes, White and Savoy are DISMISSED, WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.

Dated this 23rd day of June, 2015.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE