Barker v. Barnes et al
ORDER ADOPTING 35 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff's 32 Motion to Renew is DENIED; Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Proceed contains the same arguments as those addressed in the Recommended Disposition and is DENIED for the same reasons. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint and his claims against the remaining Defendants Barnes, White and Savoy are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/23/2015. (mcz)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
LARRY E. BARKER
ADC # 129415
BARNES, Randall Williams Unit, ADC, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended
Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No
objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are,
approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Motion to Renew (Docket No. 32) is DENIED.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed (Docket No. 34) contains the same
arguments as those addressed in the Recommended Disposition and is DENIED for
the same reasons.
Plaintiff's Complaint (Docket No. 1) and his claims against the
remaining Defendants Barnes, White and Savoy are DISMISSED, WITHOUT
Dated this 23rd day of June, 2015.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?