Jackson v. Green et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the PLRA. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/11/2014. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CARL DANIEL JACKSON,
ADC #98003
v.

PLAINTIFF
5:14CV00184-JLH-JTK

ALVA GREEN, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney.

After a review of those proposed findings and

recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted.
2.

Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison

Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgment

dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2014.

______________________________________
James M. Moody Jr.
United States District Judge

1